Depending on the exposure risk, different precautions can be taken to protect workers from SARS-CoV-2 exposure and infection (COVID-19). That hazard changes in view of the sort of work being played out, the potential for association (drawn out etc.) with individuals, and pollution of the workplace. Bosses ought to embrace contamination counteraction and control procedures in light of an exhaustive work environment peril evaluation, utilizing suitable blends of designing and regulatory controls, safe work practices, and individual defensive hardware (PPE) to forestall laborer openings. Some OSHA norms that apply to forestalling word related openness to SARS-CoV-2 additionally expect bosses to prepare laborers on components of contamination counteraction and control, including PPE.

The overall direction beneath is intended to illuminate all U.S. laborers and managers, however doesn't adjust consistence responsibilities regarding a specific industry. Contingent upon where their tasks fall in OSHA's openness risk pyramid, laborers and businesses ought to likewise counsel extra, explicit direction for those at one or the other lower (i.e., alert) or expanded (i.e., medium, high, or extremely high) chance of openness. The openness risk pyramid and a work environment peril evaluation can assist laborers and businesses with distinguishing openness risk levels generally connected with different areas.

Depending on the employment, some employees may be exposed to medium, high, or extremely high occupational exposure hazards in places where SARS-CoV-2 is being spread by the local population. These workers are essential to the continued operation of several crucial sectors. Workers in the healthcare industry, emergency services, the processing of meat and poultry, retail establishments (such as grocery stores and pharmacies), childcare and educational facilities, as well as other critical infrastructure or vital operations, are examples of those who fall into these exposure risk groups. The shifting danger of community transmission should be kept in mind by both these employees' employers and themselves.

All companies should think about creating COVID-19 response plans that address protecting employees who stay in, or return to, their workplaces during the COVID-19 public health emergency—including if outbreak conditions evolve. These plans should use the hierarchy of controls and other tools. In conjunction with the various sector-specific materials listed above, this section includes general advice regarding safeguarding employees whose job duties carry a medium, high, or extremely high risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Screening may be a component of a comprehensive programme to monitor worker health during the pandemic, but it may be of limited value on its own because people infected with SARS-CoV-2 can spread the virus even if they do not have signs or symptoms of infection. In many workplaces, screening initiatives are probably best carried out at home by individual employees. Plans for temperature screening by employers may rely on employee self-monitoring rather than temperature measurements by employers. Consider putting such programmes into place alongside sick leave regulations that motivate unwell workers to remain at home, even those whose self-monitoring activities detect a fever.

Journal of Molecular Oncology Research are often managed through discussion on multi-disciplinary cancer conferences where medical oncologists, surgical oncologists, radiation oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, and organ-specific oncologists meet to find the best possible management for an individual patient considering the physical, social, psychological, emotional, and financial status of the patient.

Submit Mansucript through an email attachment to moloncol@molecularbiol.com

Regards,
Journal Coordinator
Journal of Molecular Oncology Research